I'm 16 and for most of my life I have heard, from various sources, that 'paedophiles' have been abusing very young children, even babies, for decades.

Now I read that Kate Fisher, a principal analyst at CEOP, has announced that 'paedophiles' are targeting "increasingly younger children".

How can they be younger than babies?

Stupid emotional statements from officials really annoy me.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-...edophiles-probe.html

This what the media do the make the impossible possible.

Pumpkinhead wrote:
a principal analyst at CEOP, has announced that 'paedophiles' are targeting "increasingly younger children"

This is true.

But your overall comments are out of context.

The first point does not follow the second.

What they are saying is nonsense.

Pedos would have been targeting their perverted desire since time immemorial.

What they mean is more people are being arrested for it but the whole announcement was full of fear factors like the idiotic claim that kiddie porn consumers are now likely to physically assault while psychiatrists say the opposite is true.

The bovver boys in blue also said this should be taken into account when sentencing. An outrageous statement that should have parliamentarians howling but was met with silence.

And you though Minority Report was science fiction.

But what about the CEOP officers who fearlessly view kiddiE porn, and therefore by their own claim, abuse victims further?.
In fact can we deduce that officers may deliberately go into CEOP with a desire to view porn and pretend to be kids online seducing adult pervs?

anyone claiming to be a CEOP 'analyst' needs analysing.