Loony Labour will not appear on Rusky TV anymore -
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43363165

Too frightened that people will put two and two together .... ?

A rather balanced statement by Jeremy Fruitcake
- even he knows that the British people hate traitors when the Country is in danger.

Perhaps Russia is the liberals so called 'Utopia'?

In The Know wrote:
British people hate traitors when the Country is in danger.

Is that why Tony Blunt - of Cambridge Five fame - got a knighthood?

Labour MPs plainly wanted to disown him.
You did not need to be a body-language expert to discern their horror.
His words jarred and they knew it.
So, I think, did Mr Corbyn after he sat down, for he remained pink in the face for the next 50 minutes and barely raised his eyes from his lap for the rest of the afternoon.

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5492731...g.html#ixzz59bvJuHXX

In The Know wrote:
Loony Labour will not appear on Rusky TV anymore -
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43363165

Too frightened that people will put two and two together .... ?

From the BBC interview "....goes beyond objective journalism..."

If that is the standard for not appearing on Russia Today then we will not see them appearing anywhere simply because the word "objective" is to all intents and purposes no longer in any dictionary (That is how it seems in any case!!!).

C'mon please accept reality and use any platform to get sensible concerns across wherever possible. I hate the lack of objectivity in media but as it is the main source of events and information I still need to at least glance at it to stay informed of "something" at least.

doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone (even the resident Ayn Rand) that more Conservative MPs have appeared on RT than Labour.

And numerous Tory MPs and the Conservative Party have been taking donations from Vlad Putin via Russian oligarchs.

Not a peep about it in the right-wing media but oh the Howls of Anguish over Max Mosley's donations to Labour!!
# does someone still think Russia is "Communist"? How quaint.

comrade hedda wrote:
numerous Tory MPs and the Conservative Party have been taking donations from Vlad Putin via Russian oligarchs


So easy to type - with no examples, links, evidence or any supporting data...

Spee wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
numerous Tory MPs and the Conservative Party have been taking donations from Vlad Putin via Russian oligarchs


So easy to type - with no examples, links, evidence or any supporting data...




Indeed very easy to type when it's the truth.

1...Litvinenko widow warns Tories over Russian donations
www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/11...er-russian-donations

#The Sunday Times reported that Russian oligarchs and their associates had registered donations of £826,100 to the Tories since Theresa May entered No 10.

2...Tory MPs have taken four times more money for appearing on Russia Today than Labour MPs
politicalscrapbook.net/2017/10/tory-mps-...day-than-labour-mps/

# Evidence sourced from Parliament's register of MP’s interests.
# political donations from Russia are declared and are no secret.

easily found but many thanks for confirming my point that Britain's largely right-wing printed media is prejudicial and biased and people allow themselves to be led by the nose by them.

The Loonies are falling apart - AGAIN !

The "truce" - in place since they did better than expected at the last election (even though they were still miles away from actually winning - will not hold much longer.

Corbyn's true colour has emerged.

Expect at least one Labour Loony to quit his post in the next few days.

The Putin will win his election (LOL !) - the Loonies will NEVER win in Britain.

hedda wrote:
Spee wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
numerous Tory MPs and the Conservative Party have been taking donations from Vlad Putin via Russian oligarchs


So easy to type - with no examples, links, evidence or any supporting data...




Indeed very easy to type when it's the truth.

1...Litvinenko widow warns Tories over Russian donations
www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/11...er-russian-donations

#The Sunday Times reported that Russian oligarchs and their associates had registered donations of £826,100 to the Tories since Theresa May entered No 10.

2...Tory MPs have taken four times more money for appearing on Russia Today than Labour MPs
politicalscrapbook.net/2017/10/tory-mps-...day-than-labour-mps/

# Evidence sourced from Parliament's register of MP’s interests.
# political donations from Russia are declared and are no secret.

easily found but many thanks for confirming my point that Britain's largely right-wing printed media is prejudicial and biased and people allow themselves to be led by the nose by them.


Thank you for that, Hedda.

Spee wrote:
hedda wrote:
Spee wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
numerous Tory MPs and the Conservative Party have been taking donations from Vlad Putin via Russian oligarchs


So easy to type - with no examples, links, evidence or any supporting data...




Indeed very easy to type when it's the truth.

1...Litvinenko widow warns Tories over Russian donations
www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/11...er-russian-donations

#The Sunday Times reported that Russian oligarchs and their associates had registered donations of £826,100 to the Tories since Theresa May entered No 10.

2...Tory MPs have taken four times more money for appearing on Russia Today than Labour MPs
politicalscrapbook.net/2017/10/tory-mps-...day-than-labour-mps/

# Evidence sourced from Parliament's register of MP’s interests.
# political donations from Russia are declared and are no secret.

easily found but many thanks for confirming my point that Britain's largely right-wing printed media is prejudicial and biased and people allow themselves to be led by the nose by them.


Thank you for that, Hedda.




my pleasure.

Does anyone know what ITK is on about?

ITK is a master of the falacy of incomplete evidence, or cherry picker.

He will home in a certain data that will support his point/argument.

Whilst totally ignoring facts and information that oppose it!

An odd way to go through life.

But the condition helps to induce a misguided air of infallibility.

Spee wrote:
ITK is a master of the falacy of incomplete evidence, or cherry picker.

He will home in a certain data that will support his point/argument.

Whilst totally ignoring facts and information that oppose it!

An odd way to go through life.

But the condition helps to induce a misguided air of infallibility.




The Flatulence Twins again?
Both talking stupid again,and insulting another poster instead of sticking to facts.
Of course Russia did it,as you British have done many similar acts over the years.
The only good traitor is a dead one. If you go about providing quality homes to proven scum then what do the UK government expect?

hedda wrote:
Does anyone know what ITK is on about?

Oh, our little delusional friend is back !
(I was worried about you, hedda - in the last post you said the nurse was coming (to take you away?)

This post was originally about the Fruitcake Corbyn now saying he wont appear on Russia Today again (... ever the opportunist !)

It turned into derision of the Fruitcake's stance in Parliament yesterday.

Have you NOT seen today's front pages?
They call him everything from Putin's Puppet and Commie Corbyn to Red Jezza !!!

... and ... as I originally stated (about the British public not supporting a traitor) - the Sky Poll shows the vast majority agree with me !

news.sky.com/story/sky-data-poll-most-br...n-on-russia-11290985

Penang Pete wrote:
instead of sticking to facts.

... yes, it must be really really hard to understand that if you leave HUGE debts behind
- and have to borrow each and every month just to pay the ineterest
- that the total debt bill will go up .... LOL !

hedda wrote:
Spee wrote:
hedda wrote:
Spee wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
numerous Tory MPs and the Conservative Party have been taking donations from Vlad Putin via Russian oligarchs


So easy to type - with no examples, links, evidence or any supporting data...




Indeed very easy to type when it's the truth.

1...Litvinenko widow warns Tories over Russian donations
www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/11...er-russian-donations

#The Sunday Times reported that Russian oligarchs and their associates had registered donations of £826,100 to the Tories since Theresa May entered No 10.

2...Tory MPs have taken four times more money for appearing on Russia Today than Labour MPs
politicalscrapbook.net/2017/10/tory-mps-...day-than-labour-mps/

# Evidence sourced from Parliament's register of MP’s interests.
# political donations from Russia are declared and are no secret.

easily found but many thanks for confirming my point that Britain's largely right-wing printed media is prejudicial and biased and people allow themselves to be led by the nose by them.


Thank you for that, Hedda.




my pleasure.

Does anyone know what ITK is on about?

Perhaps he is still stoned whilst binging in Joni Mitchell records.

I wonder if he is prepping in case there is another Cold War? Whilst listening to Sigue Sigue Sputnik and Russian metal bands like Black Coffee.

ITK oddly seems to think Russia is still a Communist state.

It hasn't been since the Gorbachev days.

It has a free market economy but still has large swathes of socialist policies (not as much as the majority of Russians would like)

Much of Russia's wealth is being stolen by a handful of Oligarchs with Putin's support. Much of that wealth is parked in Britain with the support of the Conservatives (and previously New Labour).

Britain's socialist polices even under the Tories are in fact often more generous than Russia's.

Russia still pumps £Billions into health and hospitals but the UK spends far more..but mismanagement and hospitals and shonky privatizing of huge sections is the problem.

Unemployment payments etc etc are more generous (?? ) in the UK than Russia.

Subsidised housing (my bugbear ) is a good example: Russia still subsidizes housing but the state retains ownership of the properties.

Britain pumps multi £Billions of Corporate Welfare every year into private landlord's bank accounts.

The USA..home of Capitalism..spends far more on various "socialist" welfare via the Federal government and the States ..and always has.. than either Russia or the UK. The various States (and Federal government) spend $Billions on subsidised housing but as in New York where they have just built over 20,000 new cheap rent apartments..New York State retains ownership of them.

Spee wrote:
ITK is a master of the falacy of incomplete evidence, or cherry picker.

He will home in a certain data that will support his point/argument.

Whilst totally ignoring facts and information that oppose it.


Examples:-


ITK homes in on the level of Debt left by the last Labour government - quiet correctly.

Yet totally ignores the hundreds of millions of Debt left by the Thatcher and Major governments.


Somewhat lopsided thinking - and rather bizarre.

To refuse to mention, ever, a huge contributory factor to our £2T National Debt...

hedda wrote:
ITK oddly seems to think Russia is still a Communist state.

It hasn't been since the Gorbachev days.

It has a free market economy but still has large swathes of socialist policies (not as much as the majority of Russians would like)

Much of Russia's wealth is being stolen by a handful of Oligarchs with Putin's support. Much of that wealth is parked in Britain with the support of the Conservatives (and previously New Labour).

Britain's socialist polices even under the Tories are in fact often more generous than Russia's.

Russia still pumps £Billions into health and hospitals but the UK spends far more..but mismanagement and hospitals and shonky privatizing of huge sections is the problem.

Unemployment payments etc etc are more generous (?? ) in the UK than Russia.

Subsidised housing (my bugbear ) is a good example: Russia still subsidizes housing but the state retains ownership of the properties.

Britain pumps multi £Billions of Corporate Welfare every year into private landlord's bank accounts.

The USA..home of Capitalism..spends far more on various "socialist" welfare via the Federal government and the States ..and always has.. than either Russia or the UK. The various States (and Federal government) spend $Billions on subsidised housing but as in New York where they have just built over 20,000 new cheap rent apartments..New York State retains ownership of them.

More ramblings from our Loony friend !
(I blame the blood rushing to his head as he's "down-under")

Is there a coherent point to all this, hedda?